The Senate on Thursday suspended Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan, representing Kogi Central, for a period of six months.
The decision followed the recommendations of the Senate Committee on Ethics, Privileges, and Public Petitions, which found her guilty of misconduct and failure to appear before the committee.
The suspension stems from allegations of sexual harassment that Akpoti-Uduaghan levelled against Senate President Godswill Akpabio.
She accused Akpabio of obstructing her legislative motions, particularly those concerning the Ajaokuta Steel Company, and claimed he referred to her as a “nightclub girl” during a Senate session—a remark for which he later apologised.
Presenting the committee’s report during Thursday’s plenary, Chairman Senator Neda Imasuen stated that Akpoti-Uduaghan was found guilty of all allegations due to her non-compliance with the committee’s proceedings.
The panel also recommended that her salary and security details be withdrawn during the suspension period.
In addition to the suspension, the committee advised that Akpoti-Uduaghan issue a formal apology to the Senate for actions deemed disrespectful to the institution.
The Senate’s decision marks a significant development in the ongoing controversy surrounding Akpoti-Uduaghan’s allegations against the Senate President.
Akpabio has consistently denied any misconduct, emphasizing his respect for women and refuting the claims as unfounded.
As a result of the suspension, Akpoti-Uduaghan will be barred from accessing the National Assembly premises, and her office will remain locked for the duration of the six-month period.
Among those who spoke during the deliberation on the Committee’s recommendation was Abba Moro who pleaded for leniency and a reduction in the recommended six months for suspension.
He said, “We plead that while implementing these recommendations, which are likely to be approved by the Senate, the 6-month suspension for Senator Natasha is reduced to 3 months, if convenient for the Senate and Mr. President. Three months is sufficient for some level of restitution.”
